• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Related Links
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of High Institute of Public Health
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 54 (2024)
Volume Volume 53 (2023)
Volume Volume 52 (2022)
Volume Volume 51 (2021)
Volume Volume 50 (2020)
Volume Volume 49 (2019)
Volume Volume 48 (2018)
Volume Volume 47 (2017)
Volume Volume 46 (2016)
Volume Volume 45 (2015)
Volume Volume 44 (2014)
Volume Volume 43 (2013)
Volume Volume 42 (2012)
Volume Volume 41 (2011)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2009)
Volume Volume 38 (2008)
Volume Volume 37 (2007)
Volume Volume 36 (2006)
Volume Volume 35 (2005)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 34 (2004)
Volume Volume 33 (2003)
Volume Volume 32 (2002)
Volume Volume 31 (2001)
Volume Volume 30 (2000)
Volume Volume 29 (1999)
Al-Trabolsi, H., Alshehri, M. (2005). Are Hemophiliacs Naturally Anti-Coagulated?. Journal of High Institute of Public Health, 35(2), 369-376. doi: 10.21608/jhiph.2005.177863
Hassan A. Al-Trabolsi; Mohammed Alshehri. "Are Hemophiliacs Naturally Anti-Coagulated?". Journal of High Institute of Public Health, 35, 2, 2005, 369-376. doi: 10.21608/jhiph.2005.177863
Al-Trabolsi, H., Alshehri, M. (2005). 'Are Hemophiliacs Naturally Anti-Coagulated?', Journal of High Institute of Public Health, 35(2), pp. 369-376. doi: 10.21608/jhiph.2005.177863
Al-Trabolsi, H., Alshehri, M. Are Hemophiliacs Naturally Anti-Coagulated?. Journal of High Institute of Public Health, 2005; 35(2): 369-376. doi: 10.21608/jhiph.2005.177863

Are Hemophiliacs Naturally Anti-Coagulated?

Article 11, Volume 35, Issue 2, April 2005, Page 369-376  XML
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jhiph.2005.177863
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Hassan A. Al-Trabolsi; Mohammed Alshehri
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Three cases of boys were reported with severe hemophilia A [11 years, 5 years and 1 year old]. They all underwent central venous line [CVL] insertion for primary prophylaxis in the first and the third cases and for the induction of immune tolerance in the second case. In all cases, the CVL was a subcutaneous port-a-catheter and the CVL associated thrombosis was suspected because of malfunction of the port-a-catheter. In one of the boys, the port-a-catheter had been in place for 6 months and in the other 2 for over 3 years. In all three boys, there was no evidence of an underlying genetic predisposition to thrombosis, e.g., activated protein C [APC] resistance. All of them underwent bilateral arm venogram which confirmed the presence of CVL- related thrombosis. Thrombi were located in the left subclavian and brachiocephalic veins in the first and second cases, and in the left brachiocephalic vein in the third case. These findings were unexpected as historically hemophiliacs are through to be protected from thrombosis by virtue of anticoagulation nature of their disease. Based on this observation, it is strongly recommend that physicians caring for hemophiliacs to critically should evaluate the risks and benefits related to CVL insertion.
Keywords
hemophilia; thrombosis; central venous line
Statistics
Article View: 108
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.