• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Related Links
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of High Institute of Public Health
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 54 (2024)
Volume Volume 53 (2023)
Volume Volume 52 (2022)
Volume Volume 51 (2021)
Volume Volume 50 (2020)
Volume Volume 49 (2019)
Volume Volume 48 (2018)
Volume Volume 47 (2017)
Volume Volume 46 (2016)
Volume Volume 45 (2015)
Volume Volume 44 (2014)
Volume Volume 43 (2013)
Volume Volume 42 (2012)
Volume Volume 41 (2011)
Volume Volume 40 (2010)
Volume Volume 39 (2009)
Volume Volume 38 (2008)
Volume Volume 37 (2007)
Volume Volume 36 (2006)
Volume Volume 35 (2005)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 34 (2004)
Volume Volume 33 (2003)
Volume Volume 32 (2002)
Volume Volume 31 (2001)
Volume Volume 30 (2000)
Volume Volume 29 (1999)
Al-Attar, L., Bakr, W., Abd Al-Aleem, R. (2005). Do Urine Collection Techniques Affect Contamination?. Journal of High Institute of Public Health, 35(1), 55-66. doi: 10.21608/jhiph.2005.179521
Laila Al-Attar; Wafaa M K. Bakr; Randa Abd Al-Aleem. "Do Urine Collection Techniques Affect Contamination?". Journal of High Institute of Public Health, 35, 1, 2005, 55-66. doi: 10.21608/jhiph.2005.179521
Al-Attar, L., Bakr, W., Abd Al-Aleem, R. (2005). 'Do Urine Collection Techniques Affect Contamination?', Journal of High Institute of Public Health, 35(1), pp. 55-66. doi: 10.21608/jhiph.2005.179521
Al-Attar, L., Bakr, W., Abd Al-Aleem, R. Do Urine Collection Techniques Affect Contamination?. Journal of High Institute of Public Health, 2005; 35(1): 55-66. doi: 10.21608/jhiph.2005.179521

Do Urine Collection Techniques Affect Contamination?

Article 5, Volume 35, Issue 1, January 2005, Page 55-66  XML
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jhiph.2005.179521
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Laila Al-Attar; Wafaa M K. Bakr; Randa Abd Al-Aleem
Microbiology Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Egypt
Abstract
The aim of the microbiology laboratory in the management of urinary tract infection [UTI] is to reduce morbidity and mortality through accurate and timely diagnosis with appropriate antimicrobial sensitivity testing. Although optimal specimen collection, processing, and interpretation should provide the clinician with a precise answer, no single evaluation method is fool proof and applicable to all patient groups. So this study aimed at validating 3 different urine sampling techniques, clean catch midstream [CCMS], midstream [MS], and nothing techniques, regarding bacterial contamination. The study involved 300 urine samples taken from females, who were attending either the out patients clinics at the Main University Hospital or the Sporting Students Hospital in Alexandria. All urine samples were subjected to quantitative and qualitative cultures on blood agar and MacConkey’s agar. Contamination was found in 66% of the studied specimens. CCMS, MS, and nothing techniques have approximately identical contamination rates and the difference between their results were not statistically significant [76%, 80%, and 90%, respectively]. It can be recommended that midstream or nothing techniques could be used in collection urine specimens instead of the tedious CCMS.
Keywords
Urine Collection Techniques; Contamination
Statistics
Article View: 133
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.